Societatea evoca relativismul, insa trebuie sa …?

In articolul sau, `Society say Relativism` Greg Koukl scoate in evidenta dilema societatii in care traim (referire la situatia vestica). Acesta adreseaza problema adevarului, care ar trebuie sa fie la temelia unei Institutii legale (adica tribunal), care in zilele noastre este cunoscuta sub umbrela miscarilor mafiote/si lipsite de un adevar absolut.  Unde trasam aceasta linie atunci cand intram intr-un compromis? Suntem gata sa recunoastem ca Curtea Consitutionala este lipsita de valorile adevarului absolut/Divin? Daca aceste Institutii s-au departat de aceste valori, care este motivul petnru care ne prezentam inaintea acestor institutii? Ca si crestini, credeti ca ar trebuii sa respectam niste legi care sunt manevrate si manipulate de mafia guvernului romanesc? 
 
Va las sa cititi concluzia lui Greg in limba engleza:

`What is legal is not what is at issue here. That’s not the question. We know what is legal and we think what is legal is wrong. Why? Because there is a higher Law that contradicts what is legal presently in this country. That higher Law says that all human beings–even little bitty, small human beings–are made in the image of God and therefore they have certain rights which ought not be violated. And when you violate those, even though you are keeping the law of the land, you are violating the Law of God.` Click to read  - Greg Koukl 

Astept contributia dumneavoastra.